tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-90578924716687387302024-02-20T02:58:52.154-08:00Critical SquareChris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.comBlogger24125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-13270753252415571552012-10-30T18:25:00.001-07:002012-10-30T18:25:39.570-07:00'Community' back in February; 'Star Wars' back in 2015The important news story today is Hurricane Sandy. But there was some entertainment news today as well. News that may concern a couple of extremely passionate fanbases. <br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><span style="font-size: large;">'Community'</span><br />
<br />
Disappointing news first. February 7th. That's the new premiere date for the fourth season of <i>Community</i>. Over 3 months away. The Australian Open will have taken place by then. <i>Community'</i>s unofficial sister show <i>Cougar Town</i> will have returned by then. My point being: a shift from Oct. 19th to Feb. 7th is pretty drastic. The one good part of this news is that the show will be returning to its normal Thursday timeslot at 8pm with <i>Parks and Recreation </i>following at 8:30pm. So it's not all bad news.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">'Star Wars'</span><br />
<br />
The real big news today (entertainment news, that is) came when it was announced that Disney was purchasing Lucasfilm for over four billion dollars. And with that purchase, a reboot (relaunch?) of the <i>Star Wars</i> film franchise. This is news that most geeks around the globe thought they would never hear and a lot of them didn't want to hear. But the truth is, they should have known this was going to happen sooner or later. There is just too much money to be made with such a lucrative property. Lucas always knew this was the case. Hollywood executives knew it. And deep down, all the purists out there knew it.<br />
<br />
Today, Star Wars has many more fans besides the original trilogy purists. There is a whole Expanded Universe to the Star Wars franchise. There are fans out there whose primary connection to the franchise is through the video games or the <i>Clone Wars</i> series on Cartoon Network. And then there are the numerous tie-in novels and comic books. If the franchise is going to continue on in those mediums then why shouldn't it also continue on entertainment's biggest stage.<br />
<br />
The answer that most will give is that Episodes I-III were horrible films. It is undoubtedly true that that is the universal consensus for the prequel trilogy. Even people who liked them when they first came out have now reversed course. A part of that may be that the CGI effects no longer make up for the wooden dialogue and acting. In fact, the CGI only adds to the trilogy's problems. The green-screen technology removes a certain texture from the saga. Bland characters and an overemphasis on CGI is not the way to go.<br />
<br />
Lucas will not be directing these films. However, big Hollywood will still be in control of the final product. So there is plenty of reasons to be nervous about what Episode 7 might look like. We can only hope that some of these people have learned from past mistakes. The answer to improving this franchise does not lie in improved technology. No, Star Wars needs characters, settings, and story. At this point, it's only natural to be intrigued and a little excited at the possibilities. But eventually, as the film develops and becomes more real, more and more fans will be skeptical towards the decisions being made. For now, fans who have been eager to see Episode 7 since the prequel trilogy concluded in 2005, today's news must come as welcome surprise. <br />
<br />
Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-66685256343747355652012-10-10T11:14:00.000-07:002012-10-10T11:14:09.830-07:00'Community' and 'Louie' Delays<span style="font-size: large;">Two cult comedies are delayed for two totally different reasons</span><br />
<br />
It was disappointing news initially when NBC decided to postpone <em>Community's</em> Oct. 19th premiere. I know I haven't done a recap or reaction to a new series in a couple of weeks* but <em>Community</em> was a show that I was really looking forward to writing about. The good news about the postponement is that <em>Community</em> might not be returning to a Friday night death slot. The bad news is that we don't know that for sure. In fact, know one knows for sure what date or what time <em>Community</em> will return. Can only hope that it happens before Thanksgiving. If not, it's likely <em>Community</em> won't come back until mid-season. That would suck.<br />
<a name='more'></a><em>Louie </em>won't return for a fourth season until spring 2014. This delay doesn't bother me as much (though it is a little strange to type 2014. I guess I always thought the world would end with 2012). Mostly because it's Louis C.K.'s decision. Also because <em>Louie</em> isn't a serialized show in which fans eagerly await resolution to a cliffhanger. I think an extended hiatus like this might become common procedure for this FX comedy. It could be that network's version of <em>Curb your Enthusiasm</em>. That show has been off the air for 24 months between seasons a couple of times during its run but no one saw it as any great tragedy. Fans enjoy it when it's on and they're content when it's not. I think the same goes for <em>Louie.</em><br />
<em></em><br />
*I will start recapping <em>Homeland </em>next week. I wanted to wait until the third episode because I read several reviews of the second season that were based on the first two episodes and was afraid my recaps would be influenced by those reviews. I also want to write "check-in" posts on <em>Parks and Recreation, Revolution, Last Resort, The Good Wife, and Once Upon a Time. </em>I will have posts on those shows in the coming weeks beginning with <em>Parks and Recreation</em> this week.Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-42870736607351226692012-09-26T10:31:00.000-07:002012-09-26T10:31:17.603-07:00'Last Resort': Initial Reaction<span style="font-size: large;">'Last Resort,' ABC's most recent entry into the action-adventure serial, launches with an intelligent and thrilling</span> <span style="font-size: large;">first hour. It does what the best of pilot episodes are supposed to do: has the audience counting the days (or hours) until the next episode.</span><br />
<br />
Until then, we will just have to watch the pilot episode, titled "Captain," a couple more times. Now, I've never been a fan of pilot episodes. By this I mean, for the shows that I watch, I rarely (if ever) consider a pilot to be among the top episodes of any given series. This is why I always find it odd when first year programs submit their pilot episodes to be considered at the Emmys (I don't know if this it what <i>Homeland</i> did). If the pilot were considered the best episode, then the entire show would be a down hill experience after its opening act. No, as mentioned above, a pilot's job is to serve as a hook to reel in viewers for the next installment. And <i>Last Resort'</i>s pilot definitely succeeded in that regard.<br />
<br />
<i>NOTE: This is not a review of the show. This is an "Initial Reaction." The following are the elements of the first hour of </i>Last Resort<i>
that caught my attention and have stuck with me. I do speculate on the future of this show
more than I have done in past Initial Reactions. This is because I
don't want to give out too many spoilers since some will be reading this
before they watch the episode. "Captain" is available on Hulu prior to its </i>Thursday, September 27th premiers (8pm EST) premiere<i>.</i><br />
<br />
<br />
With that said <b>SPOILERS still appear in this post.</b><br />
<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
Within the first five minutes, it is clear that the target audience for this show was not the same young adult demographic (16-25?) that NBC seems to be aiming for with <i>Revolution</i> (I know that NBC is trying for a broader audience than this, but <i>Revolution</i> comes off as if it's meant for teenagers who recently stopped watching iCarly). No,<i> Last Resort</i> is a show for grown ups. This show respects the intelligence of its audience. The characters on the submarine feel like real military personnel and the audience shares a familiarity with the world which allows them to identify with the predicament the characters find themselves in. Some people may nitpick some of the military details but I don't critique works of popular culture on how accurately they portray basic procedures of business and/or institutions.<br />
<br />
The primary setting for "Captain" is on a submarine called the USS <i>Colorado. </i>I think the show presents this tight knit group of (mostly) young and dutiful military personnel in the most respectable manner that one can expect from a network drama. The Captain that gives the episode its title is Captain Marcus Chaplin (Andre Braugher). Braugher's presence is a powerful one. It hard not to listen intently when he's speaking. And the most emotionally gripping moments of this first hour happen while Braugher is speaking. He is the main reason why I made that comment about the first five minutes in the above paragraph. Andre Braugher doesn't sign up for a show for kids.<br />
<br />
Captain Chaplin's second-in-command is the XO Lt. Commander Sam Kendal (Scott Speedman). It's nice to see Speedman on television again. I actually watched a lot (too much really)<i> </i>of <i>Felicity</i> on Netflix Streaming last year and wondered what ever became of young Mr. Speedman. Since he starred on the WB drama, he starred in the first couple of <i>Underworld</i> movies. Not great movies in my opinion, and it appears like they put an end to any movie career that Speedman may have been aspiring for. Fortunately, television is a great place to turn to for career resurrection. He has leading man potential and plays more than just a straight character is the pilot. He is put in some difficult positions and has to manage the various personalities and motives of his crew. <br />
<br />
One potential problem with the character of Sam Kendal may involve his wife Christine (Jessy Schram). I expect the two characters to be separated for most of early episodes of this show--if not more-- and it's not clear how Christine will fit into the show. Right now, Sam's decisions are driven by a desire to return home to his wife. The character will need more depth than that of a man attempting to reunite with his wife as the show moves forward. Actually, for us to care about any such reunion, both characters need to be more fully developed. On <i>Lost</i>, there was the epic, long distance love story between Desmond and Penny. That story arc was a both a critics and fan favorite. It also played out over several seasons. However, Desmond wasn't the male lead and Penny only appeared in a couple of episode per season. A littlebit here and there went a long way. For <i>Last Resort</i>, too much focus on husband pining for lovely wife could get tiresome. I'm not expecting this to happen. Just a minor concern I have after watching the pilot.<br />
<br />
The character of Christine isn't the only question mark at this point. For a 43 minutes segment of television, "Captain" had many characters with speaking parts. I might have to go back and count exactly (and then subtract the characters that don't survive through the first hour). It's not entirely clear which characters are going to be part of the regular ensemble and which ones will be recurring or guesting. I also brought this issue up with <i>Go On</i>, a half hour comedy. The good news for <i>Last Resort</i> is that it's an hour long drama. Therefore, there is more airtime available for a larger cast. However, if the writers and execs do plan on having an ensemble comprised of 10-14 regular characters, they shouldn't feel compelled to have them all appear in every single episode. While I thoroughly enjoyed this hour, there was a lot of exposition and plot. One more reason why people may want to watch "Captain" more than once.<br />
<br />
A couple other thoughts:<br />
<ul>
<li>As mentioned earlier, this is a young cast. Robert Patrick brings the average up a little bit with his character, COB Joseph Prosser. Patrick may have most intriguing role in the pilot as a man with divided loyalties. On the other end of the spectrum is Kylie Sinclair (played by Autumn Reeser). A character that lacks any connection to any of the other characters so far but basically serves as an exposition tool in the pilot. That character is the least interesting after 43 minutes. I would like the younger characters and actors to be interesting enough to able to compete with the likes of Andre Braugher and Robert Patrick. It will be an uphill battle.</li>
<li>The sub crew sets up station on the fictional Sainte Marina island. I couldn't tell the exact geographic location of this fictional island. Plus, we're not explicitly told which nation was the recognized authority over this island before the crew. There is an exchange of dialogue between the SEAL James King (Daniel Lissing) and Julian Serrat (Sahr Ngaujah) that insinuates that Sainte Marina is under the control of the criminal Serrat. However, if the island has inhabitants and businesses it must be under the control an actual country. I am not saying that they would have a military stationed there. But I think they would be the first country to be upset with the USS <i>Colorado</i> taking control of it. </li>
<li>For months I have heard or read critics discuss this pilot on podcasts and blogs. The one thing I encounter every time is that these critics have trouble envisioning the long game of this show. That is what a lot of people said about <i>Lost</i>. I don't know what this series will look like three episodes from now either. At this moment, I don't really care. I do know that Shawn Ryan (<i>The Shield</i>) is one of the creators of <i>Last Resort</i> and that I trust that he has some kind of plan. </li>
</ul>
Today, I'm just pleased that the networks were able to give us one pilot that was this exciting. I was beginning to lost faith in the whole system. Well, I still have for the most part. I just hope people tune in on Thursday nights to watch so we can get more episodes in the coming weeks.<br /><br />
<br />Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-53103322153243538972012-09-19T06:46:00.003-07:002012-09-19T06:46:58.715-07:00FREE Showtime!! 'Homeland' Recaps Are A GoSpoke to the nicest Comcast Customer Service Representative ever this morning. Reduced the bill by $20/month over the next year and gave us Showtime free for the next six months. Now I can watch and write about <i>Homeland</i> on the night it actually airs. That's a good thing too since I really don't see myself regularly recapping any other show this fall. Plus, my brother Jimmy can get to watch <i>Dexter</i>. I will probably write on that show's season premiere and/or I will let Jimmy guest recap it himself if he wants. Unfortunately, Showtime doesn't offer up too many good movies so the benefits may end with their original programming. Still, not a bad deal.Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-62969106206262123712012-09-17T17:42:00.000-07:002012-09-17T17:52:39.131-07:00'Revolution': Initial Reaction
<b><span style="font-size: small;">This new 'Lost' imitator is a little more promising than past 'Lost' imitators. However, 'Revolution's first hour makes it abundantly clear that network executives still don't truly understand why the island-set mystery ever worked in the first place</span>.</b> <br />
<br />
I write this knowing perfectly well that J.J. Abrams has a producer credit for <i>Revolution</i>--a producer credit that really serves more as an endorsement for the show. Abrams neither wrote nor directed the pilot of <i>Revolution</i>. Compare that with<i> Lost</i>, where he both co-wrote and directed the pilot and then played a key role in setting up the first hints at a larger mythology. Now, <i>Revolution</i> was written by Eric Kripke (<i>Supernatural</i>) and directed by Jon Favreau (<i>Iron Man</i>). Two men who are definitely capable of creating an intriguing television show about a world that exists without electricity. It just seems doubtful that the suits at NBC will allow Kripke and his writers make such a version of the show.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a>It's probably unfair to single out NBC on the issue of executives hindering their writers' creative visions. And it's probably unfair for me to even presume/insinuate that this is an issue as far as <i>Revolution </i>is concerned. Still, it's hard not to think these things when one watches the pilot. There are just too many nonsensical moments in the pilot where I either laughed, cringed, or rolled my eyes. Here's a list of some of those moments (SPOILER ALERT).<br />
<br />
<ul>
<li>First, NBC put the episode On Demand prior to its official September 17th premiere. While I watched it On Demand, enormous in-show promos for the Sep. 17th premiere of <i>Revolution</i> appeared four or five times. That's correct. NBC promoted the premiere of <i>Revolution</i> to viewers watching the premiere <i>Revolution</i>!! Why? The one time this summer/early fall where I thought I didn't have to worry about seeing those annoying ads. I didn't think those in-show promos could get any more annoying but NBC always finds a way.</li>
<li>The cul-de-sac village set up. Maybe plausible. But it felt like a group of people set up a post-apocalyptic Pleasentville.</li>
<li>Speaking of the village. Why did it feel so calm when Charlie (Tracy Spiridakos) set off to find her brother. Didn't a whole bunch of the village's inhabitants just get shot/stabbed and killed? Yet, everyone went about their merry day right after the tragic event. And no one seemed to mind that one of the doctors was leaving.</li>
<li>Charlie's outfit. I'm one hundred percent positive that "costume" got tested in a focus group. The audience is expected to see Charlie as being Katniss-esque. But Katniss Everdeen doesn't display sex appeal while in the arena. Because that would be cheesy and inappropriate.</li>
<li>The trek to Chicago. Charlie and company got there pretty quickly. I'm not sure we were told how far it was from the village. But it didn't feel like their journey was too arduous (other than them almost being raped). If this show were on AMC or HBO, the whole first season would have dealt with this journey. Instead, it lasted for 10-15 minutes of screen time. </li>
<li>Arrival in Chicago. The first person our protagonists meet happens to be Charlie's Uncle Miles (Billy Burke). Well, that was easy. Maybe NBC should have commissioned a two hour pilot. They used to make those back in the day. The NBC executives must have known that they were going to give pick up the pilot to series with all the behind-the-scenes talent that's attached to it. With two hours, the events of this episode may not have been as rushed.</li>
<li>The swordplay. I get why civilians may not have guns since it's established that possessing one is illegal (in the Monroe Republic). But why don't more of Monroe's militiamen have guns when they go after Miles? Are guns on that short of supply after 15 years? If they are, how does Monroe govern over the masses. </li>
</ul>
Those are a few of the frustrating moments that come to mind. Truthfully, there are times when I won't let nonsensical happenings interfere with my enjoyment of a show/movie/book. However, that only is made possible because the characters are compelling enough to make me forget about reason and logic. <i>Lost</i> wouldn't have been <i>Lost</i> without its characters. A lot of people may claim that they primarily cared about the mythology. But take away the characters, and they would discover that they no longer cared about the mythology. <br />
<br />
With <i>V</i>, <i>FlashForward</i>, <i>The Event</i>, and <i>Revolution</i> the main cast members nearly always fill some kind of generic, cookie-cutter role to one another and to the viewers. For example, the relationship, or lack thereof, between Charlie and Maggie (the girlfriend of Charlie's dad) is a hostile one from Charlie's point-of-view. Why doesn't Charlie like Maggie (played by Anna Lise Phillips)? Because she's kind of like a stepmother. And on network TV, stepmother's are disliked by the kids. That's just a given. How I read the situation: Maggie is a well-meaning person who helps Charlie's brother Danny (Graham Rogers) cope with his asthma and Charlie dislike her because she's filled the void left by her (presumably) deceased mother (Portrayed by Elizabeth Mitchell who previously starred in <i>Lost</i> and <i>V</i>). So that relationship is now probably going to be a point of "tension" among the group going forward. Even though Charlie's dad is dead and Charlie is trying to assert herself as a mature young woman by trying to save her younger brother. So she should probably grow up considering there are obviously much worse people out to do her and her family harm.<br />
<br />
I label these posts as "Initial Reactions" for a reason. I do not work at a prestigious print and/or online publication. This is my own blog that I have as a hobby. Therefore, I do not have an editor asking me to write reviews on all the new fall shows. Unfortunately for real critics, one episode is usually all they get prior to writing a review (at least that's the case for most network shows). Reviewing programs based off one episode results in much more speculation and analysis of a show's potential rather than what they actually see. I'm guessing a lot of the reviews for <i>Revolution</i> are like that. It's impossible for reviews not to be that way with serialized dramas (or any show for that matter).<br />
<br />
I make this clarification between "review" and "reaction" because I haven't written about the positive elements of <i>Revolution</i>. One of the bright spots was seeing Giancarlo Esposito (<i>Breaking Bad</i>'s Gus Fring) in one of the more interesting roles. There's also the character of Aaron (Zak Orth) who was described <span style="color: black;">as the <a href="http://talkingtvwithryanandryan.libsyn.com/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">Hurley of this show</span></a> on the Talking TV with Ryan Ryan Podcast</span>. I wouldn't decorate him with that status at this point. But he does bring a more grounded personality into a cast of End of the World seriousness.<br />
<br />
I didn't write about either of these two characters because they weren't really part of my "Initial Reaction." I couldn't help but write about the more problematic aspects of the first hour. I'm also not going to waste my time by being speculative about what could be. Maybe that's my fault for being a cynic. Truthfully, it's hard not to be a cynic with <i>Revolution</i>. I feel like I've seen this pilot before. Probably because I pretty much have. My reaction to the pilots of <i>V, FlashForward, </i>and<i> The Event </i>were all the same as this one. None of them were actually good on their own. The following episodes only took steps backward instead of forward. Not surprisingly, none of them lasted for more than a season and a half.<br />
<br />
It's an uphill battle for <i>Revolution</i>. I could be proven wrong. I honestly hope that I will be. <br />
<ul>
</ul>
Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-66730330509171830612012-09-17T08:40:00.001-07:002012-09-17T08:43:43.985-07:00'Bates Motel' Casting and 'Community' minus Donald Glover?<h2>
'Bates Motel"</h2>
Freddie Highmore (<i>Charlie and the Chocolate Factory</i>) has been cast as a young Norman Bates in A&E's upcoming <i>Bates Motel</i>. Max Theriot (<i>Kit Kitterage: An American Girl</i>) has also <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/ae-bates-motel-psycho-prequel-max-thieriot-freddie-highmore-vera-farmiga-370533" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">been cast</span></a> as Norman's older brother, Dylan. For those failing to remember an older brother from Hitchcock's <i>Psycho</i>, Dylan is a new character developed for this series. Vera Farmiga was cast as Norman's mother, Norma, a few weeks ago. A&E also released this <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/ae-bates-motel-carlton-cuse-vera-farmiga-photo-369548" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">new poster</span></a> to The Hollywood Reporter.<br />
<br />
Source: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/ae-psycho-prequel-bates-motel-norman-bates-freddie-highmore-vera-farmiga-370516" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">The Hollywood Reporter</span></a> <br />
<br />
<br />
<h2>
'Community'</h2>
Donal Glover (Troy from NBC's <i>Community</i>) is developing a new comedy at NBC. The potential pilot could be made for the 2013-2014 season and would see Glover in the lead role if it got picked up to series. <i>Community</i>, which has already lost creator Dan Harmon, wouldn't be the same if it continued into a fifth season minus Troy. Almost seems like NBC and Glover aren't even taking <i>Community</i> into consideration with the development of a new show. Have they already accepted that the fourth season will be its last? I hope not.<br />
<br />
Source: <a href="http://tvline.com/2012/09/12/donald-glover-developing-new-nbc-comedy/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">TV Line</span></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-3622587115630406752012-09-12T10:05:00.000-07:002012-09-12T10:06:17.323-07:00Ratings for Tuesday Night: Go On and The New Normal<h2>
'Go On ' and 'The New Normal' Off to Decent Starts</h2>
<br />
The second episode of <i>Go On</i> did pretty well for its regular timeslot debut. The Matthew Perry show was seen by 9.6 million total viewers and had a 3.4 rating in the 18-49 demo. It appears that the post-Olympics preview was a wise strategy for this show. For now, anyway. <br />
<br />
<i>The New Normal</i> didn't fare as in its second episode. It had 7.0 million total viewers and a 2.5 rating among viewers aged 18-49. Pretty much the same as ratings as the Monday night premiere.<br />
<br />
For more details on Nielsen Ratings on these and other network programs from Tuesday nights see <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/09/12/tv-ratings-tuesday-so-you-think-you-can-dance-and-the-new-normal-flat-the-voice-dips-parenthood-premieres-down/148357/" style="color: blue;" target="_blank">TVbytheNumbers</a>.Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-67441074164482980182012-09-12T09:02:00.000-07:002012-09-12T09:04:11.766-07:00'Go On': Initial Reaction<h2>
Go On (Tuesdays @ 9:00 pm NBC)</h2>
<br />
Matthew Perry hasn't been the luckiest of actors since <i>Friends</i> ended nearly a decade ago. He starred in the NBC drama <i>Studio 60 On the Sunset Strip</i> in 2006. That Aaron Sorkin produced show only last for one season. A couple of years ago he starred in ABC's <i>Mr. Sunshine</i>. That half-hour comedy only lasted for 13 episodes. For the 2012-13 TV season NBC and Matthew Perry are making one more attempt at bringing back that old <i>Friends</i> magic with the group therapy comedy <i>Go On</i>. <br />
<br />
Like <i>The New Normal</i> that aired after it, NBC had already previewed the <i>Go On</i> pilot prior to the official Tuesday night premiere. The preview of the pilot was first broadcast in a post-Olympics spot on August 8th. The show attained a robust sample viewing audience of over 15 million viewers. The pilot was re-broadcast on Monday night. After seeing the first episode, I was willing to give the show another shot. It will be interesting to find out how many people decided to do the same (the ratings for last night will be posted this afternoon).<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a>My initial reaction to <i>Go On</i> is one of apathy. There is a slightly, goofy charm surrounding the sitcom's environment but we haven't really gotten to know the ensemble cast yet. The problem may be that the show is struggling to find coherence among a divided ensemble. Ryan King (Matthew Perry), the protagonist. has his own sports talk radio program. Ryan is also recovering from the death of his wife and attends group therapy to help him through his loss. There are supporting characters at both the job and group therapy. Having two settings, with two sets of characters, on a show that lasts 22 minutes may be a little too much to ask for.<br />
<br />
Some critics have compared <i>Go On</i> to <i>Community</i>. In setup anyway. The male lead of both shows is forced to lead a group of diverse misfits while trying to move on with his own life. In <i>Go On</i>'s case, the man is trying to get over the death of his wife (a rather dour subject for a comedy to deal with). For <i>Community</i>, Jeff Winger (Joel Mchale) is trying to earn a real law degree after being found out that he was a fraud. Jeff no longer has a job. Therefore, we only see the Greendale Community College aspect of his life. We see the study group but not any co-workers. <i>Go On</i> has Ryan dealing with both groups. And it finds itself trying to manage a frenetic pace because of the two settings.<br />
<br />
One of the subplots of "He Got Game, She Got Cats" involved Ryan overworking his assistant Carrie (Allison Miller) because he didn't want to go home after work and be reminded of his deceased wife. This story was resolved at the halfway point before the subplots involving two of the group therapy members began. The episode got its title from those subplots (one involving Sonia [Sarah Baker]with her cats and the other George [Bill Cobbs] and his missing basketball).<br />
<br />
Remarkably, those three actors are all part of the "Recurring Cast." They are not technically series regulars. It's difficult to believe that after watching this particular installment. Some of those listed as series regulars or part of the "Main Cast" have barely been on screen in the first two episodes. Of course, you can only show so much in 21 or 22 minutes. Too many characters could hinder the audience from getting to know any of them. And that will be a real problem for <i>Go On</i> moving forward.<br />
<br />
<br />Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-87617488288019206862012-09-12T06:50:00.003-07:002012-09-12T07:37:28.144-07:00'The New Normal': Initial Reaction<h2>
The New Normal (Tuesdays @ 9:30 NBC)</h2>
<br />
First off, I didn't pay close attention to NBC's schedule of its new series. The <i>New Normal's</i>
pilot actually aired on Monday after <i>The Voice</i>. Tuesday had NBC
broadcasting the second episode, called "Sofa's Choice," in the show's
regular Tuesday night time slot. Fortunately, it is easier to write a
review (or reaction) to a show when you have seen more than one
installment. Unfortunately, I think two episodes of <i>The New Normal</i> may have been two too many.<br />
<i></i><br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
<i>The New Normal</i> was created by Ryan Murphy. Murphy also created Fox's <i>Glee</i>. And I have really come to hate <i>Glee</i>.<br />
<br />
One factor for my dislike of <i>Glee</i> is the same part that nearly all of its audience loves: Coach Sue Sylvester. Sue Sylvester was the main reason I even bothered watching <i>Glee</i>. But early in season two, I lost any motivation I keep tuning into the show. I just got tired of her jokes (more accurately described as offensive remarks). It's strange that a show that is basically the longest PSA for acceptance of gays and anti-bullying relies on stereotypical jokes for the bulk of its humor. Of course, Sue isn't the protagonist of <i>Glee</i>. So it manages to get away with these types of jokes. Additionally, the music of <i>Glee</i> was never for me. Therefore, I no longer have any business to continue watching. <br />
<br />
Well, <i>The New Normal</i> doesn't have music. But it does have its own version of Sue Sylvester. Jane Forest, or Nana (Ellen Barkin), is basically Sue without the track suit. I guess she's also more politically conservative than I recall Sue being. And yes, I did laugh at some of the racist jokes. However, after watching two episodes, I don't know anymore about the Nana character other than the fact that she is an extremely intolerant person. Or at least, she presents herself as intolerant. But I'm positive that at the conclusion of future episodes, Nana will always end up displaying some redeemable quality that allows the audience to forgive her behavior for the first twenty minutes.<br />
<br />
Now, Ellen Barkin's Nana isn't the main character of the program. The central characters are David (Justin Bartha) and Bryan (Andrew Rannells) who are trying to adopt a baby. Nana's granddaughter, Goldie (Georgia King), is going to serve as the surrogate mother for the gay couple's child. There's also Shania (Bebe Wood), Goldie's daughter. The stuff that goes on between those four characters is fine. The characters of David and Goldie are more of the "straight men" characters while Bryan and Shania are responsible for the non-Nana laughs. Those laughs became fewer and fewer as I watched the two episodes. In "Sofa's Choice," Shania, a seven or eight year-old, adopts the personality of Little Edie from the 1970s documentary <i>Grey Gardens</i>. It's a pop culture reference that the majority of viewers probably didn't understand (though some may have seen the HBO film of the same name that starred Drew Barrymore and Jessica Lange). People watching may have found what she was doing to be cute, but it really had nothing to do with the story. <br />
<br />
Furthermore, <i>The New Normal</i> employs a similar cinematographic style as <i>Glee</i>. It does that zooming in and out tactic that provides a light atmosphere to the setting. That visual style fits the Fox musical more appropriately than this show because in <i>Glee</i>, the cinematography is complemented by the similarly light and bouncy background soundtrack (I'm not referring to the pop songs that the club performs).<br />
<br />
It would be hard to describe <i>The New Normal</i> as horrible. The real problem is, for a comedy, it's not that funny. More problematic is the familiar characters. So if I stopped voluntarily watching <i>Glee</i> two seasons ago, there's no point to start up on starting up on a slight variation (without the music) of it today.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-84120749151266782122012-09-11T06:22:00.001-07:002012-09-11T06:23:28.820-07:00A Soft Start for Fall Begins Today<h3>
A Couple of Networks Get the Fall Season Going</h3>
<h3>
<br />Returning Shows</h3>
The Voice--Season 3 (NBC) @8pm. Premiered Monday. Continues on Tuesday.<br />
Parenthood--Season 4 (NBC) @10pm<br />
<br />
Sons of Anarchy--Season 5 (FX)10pm<br />
<br />
I didn't include any of these shows in the partial calendar I posted a few weeks ago. That's because I've never watched them. I will never watch The Voice out of principle. On the other hand, I've heard good things about Parenthood and Sons of Anarchy in the past. Both those shows are available on Netflix. So the opportunity to sample those two dramas is always there.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a>Here are some links to reviews from critics who have actually followed these shows.<br />
<br />
<b>Sons of Anarchy</b> <br />
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/maureen-ryan/sons-of-anarchy-season-5-review_b_1861060.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">Mo Ryan (Huffington Post) </span></a><br />
<br />
<b>The Voice</b><br />
<a href="http://watching-tv.ew.com/2012/09/10/the-voice-christina-blake-shelton/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">Ken Tucker (Entertainment Weekly)</span><b style="color: blue;"> </b></a><br />
<br />
<b>Parenthood</b><br />
<a href="http://www.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/parenthood-review-enter-ray-romano-1.3973077" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">Diane Werts (Newday)</span></a><br />
<br />
<h3>
<span style="color: blue;"><span style="color: black;">New Shows</span></span></h3>
<span style="color: blue;"><span style="color: black;">Go On (NBC) @9pm</span></span><br />
<span style="color: blue;"><span style="color: black;">The New Normal (NBC) @9:30pm</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: blue;"><span style="color: black;">I will watch these two shows and write about them tomorrow morning. I will link up to other reviews at that time (or probably provide a <a href="http://www.metacritic.com/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">link to Metacritic.com</span></a>).</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: blue;"><span style="color: black;">I laughed a few times during the pilot of <i>Go On</i> (Remember, the pilot had a special airing during the Olympics last month). I laughed, but not very hard. Some critics have noted that the set up for <i>Go On </i>is similar to that of <i>Community</i>. Strange to think that NBC would want to make more Community-esque programming since they have explicitly stated the Joel McHale led show brings in too narrow of an audience. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: blue;"><span style="color: black;"><i>The New Normal </i>is not a show that I have been eagerly awaiting. It's produced by Ryan Murphy (<i>Glee</i>) and I see this show as NBC's answer to <i>Modern Family</i>, a show that isn't as funny as it used to be. The most publicized aspect of this show's premiere was the story that a <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/nbc-new-normal-utah-367218" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">Utah NBC affiliate is refusing to air it</span></a>. It will be interesting to see what kind of ratings the show garners tonight. Controversies are usually good for a show's publicity. MTV's <i>Jersey Shore</i> started with a very small audience but grew when New Jersey public officials complained about the show and the mainstream media reported on it. It would have been best if those officials had just kept their mouths shut. </span> </span><br />
<br />
<br />Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-67715665788567069632012-09-10T08:00:00.001-07:002012-09-10T08:02:43.602-07:00Wonder Woman to the Small ScreenToday, it's the CW's turn to take a shot at bringing DC Comics Wonder Woman back to the small screen. For the 2011-2012 TV season, producer David E. Kelly made a <i>Wonder Woman</i> pilot for NBC with Adrianne Palicki playing the DC heroine. NBC did not pick up that pilot. Warner Bros. TV has now decided to give a Wonder Woman show another try.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
This potential CW program, tentatively titled <i>Amazon</i>, would focus on the origins of Wonder Woman's alter ego Diana of Themyscira (See <span style="color: red;"><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/cw-developing-wonder-woman-origin-story-368479" style="color: blue;" target="_blank">The Hollywood Reporter</a> <span style="color: black;">for more details)</span></span>. Basically, the <i>Smallville</i> for Wonder Woman.<br />
<br />
Executives at the always struggling CW, and the old WB Network before it, have always displayed an interest in DC characters. The Superman origin story <i>Smallville</i>, last for 10 seasons (5 on the WB, 5 on the CW). In just a few weeks, <i>Arrow</i>, a show focusing on Green Arrow/Oliver Queen, will make its debut on the teenage skewed channel. Green Arrow also had a large role in the final years of <i>Smallville</i> when he was portrayed by actor Justin Hartley. Prior to Hartley playing Green Arrow/Oliver Queen on the Superman origin story, he was set to be the star of the CW's <i>Aquaman</i>. The 2006 <i>Aquaman</i> pilot did not get picked up to series.<br />
<br />
Finally, fresh off the success of 2008's <i>The Dark Knight</i>, the CW ordered a Robin origin story pilot called <i>The Graysons</i>. Entertainment Weekly called the announcement of this project <a href="http://popwatch.ew.com/2008/10/02/graysons-cw-nig/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">The Worst Idea Ever of the Week</span></a>. A month after the pilot was announced, the project was cancelled. I guess the Powers that Be agreed that it wasn't a very good idea.<br />
<br />
So once again, the CW and Warner Bros. are taking the origin story route with a DC property. If there's one thing to take away from this strategy, it's that Warner Bros. is still set on building a Justice League Universe for the big screen. The only reason to make a Wonder Woman origin story for TV, is that the film unit expects to make a true Wonder Woman film in the near future. Unfortunately for the studio, adapting Justice League properties has not always been easy. Warner Bros. has been extremely successful with Christopher Nolan's Dark Knight Trilogy. However, the last Superman film, 2006's <i>Superman Returns</i>, was not loved by audiences, and <i>Green Lantern</i> fared even worse with moviegoers and critics alike. Superman will get yet another chance as a movie with next summer's <i>Man of Steel</i> (Directed by Zack Snyder). Warner Brothers and DC must be praying that that movie will be the launch pad for more Justice League movies.<br />
<br />
I liked<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/justice-league-movie-avengers-comic-con-346608" target="_blank"> <span style="color: blue;">the idea</span></a> of Warner Bros. building a shared Justice League Universe on television. Not a shared "origin story" universe, but one where Diana is already Wonder Woman and Bruce Wayne is Batman (Seriously, there is no point to rebooting the Batman character for another movie franchise. It will inevitably fall short of Nolan's films). The network and studio will already have one series down if <i>Arrow</i> proves a success. <br />
<br />
But I'm a realist. I know that there is much more money to be made in movies than in TV. After all, any given show on the CW is lucky to rein in an audience of 3 million viewers. Well made Justice League movies could earn the studio billions of dollars in revenue. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-30283664910207907432012-09-06T09:06:00.002-07:002012-09-06T09:06:49.341-07:00Fall is Here: Time for New and Returning Shows<h2>
What to Expect from this Blog in the Coming Weeks</h2>
The best time of year for TV fans is almost here. The traditional launch of a new TV season usually begins in Autumn. This mean the old Networks are going to be launching a whole new slate of programs, most of which will be cancelled before the mid-season break. Fortunately, there are plenty of cable favorites that are returning as well including Homeland, The Walking Dead, Boardwalk Empire, and Dexter for those who still care (I'm looking at you brother Jimmy). Sorry, Mad Men won't be back until next Spring. I won't be writing up on all these shows. After all, according to <a href="http://popwatch.ew.com/2012/09/05/homeland-fall-tv-preview/" target="_blank">Entertainment Weekly's cover</a> of their Fall Preview issue, there will be 104 shows this fall. 104!! Too many for one man. But based off what I've read from some critics and my own personal taste, there are definitely a fair number of new shows that I will be writing about in the coming weeks. After the jump, a truncated calendar of key premiere dates.<br />
<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><u>September--New Shows</u><br />
<br />
Go On (NBC)--9/11<br />
Revolution (NBC)--9/17<br />
The Mindy Project (FOX)--9/25<br />
Vegas(CBS)--9/25<br />
Animal Practice (NBC)--9/26<br />
The Neighbors (ABC)--9/26<br />
Last Resort (ABC)--9/27<br />
Elementary (CBS)--9/27<br />
666 Park Avenue (ABC)--9/30<br />
<br />
<br />
<u>September--Old Shows</u><br />
<br />
Boardwalk Empire (HBO)--9/16<br />
Parks and Recreation (NBC)--9/20<br />
How I Met Your Mother (CBS)--9/24<br />
New Girl (FOX)--9/25<br />
Modern Family(ABC)--9/26 <br />
Person of Interest (CBS)--9/27<br />
Fringe (FOX)--9/28<br />
The Good Wife (CBS)--9/30<br />
Bob's Burgers (FOX)--9/30<br />
Dexter (Showtime)--9/30<br />
Homeland (Showtime)--9/30<br />
<br />
<u>October--New Shows</u><br />
<br />
Arrow (CW)--10/10<br />
Nashville (ABC)--10/10<br />
Beauty and the Beast(CW)--10/11<br />
<br />
<u>October--Returning Shows</u><br />
<br />
30 Rock (NBC)--10/4<br />
It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia (FX)--10/11<br />
The Walking Dead (AMC)--10/14<br />
Suburgatory (ABC)--10/17<br />
Community (NBC)--10/19<br />
Happy Endings (ABC)--10/23<br />
<br />
Okay. I counted 29 shows on that list. I consider that a fair number. Now, I won't be writing up on all these shows on a weekly basis. And I may not write about them on their respective premiere dates. But I will, at the very least, share some thoughts and opinions on the majority of them. I would like to say all but I make no guarantees. <br />
<br />
The one surprise I found from the complete fall schedule: The number of returning comedies being held back until October. All of the new comedies will begin in September. I was surprised the new shows weren't spread out more.<br />
<u><br /></u>
<br />Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-43177128174253389672012-09-02T21:37:00.002-07:002012-09-02T21:37:48.719-07:00Breaking Bad 5.8 "Gliding Over All" Recap<i>W.W.</i><br />
<br />
<i>Woodrow Wilson...Willy Wonka....<b>Walter White</b>?</i><br />
<br />
Back when Hank jokingly proposed the idea that W.W. was indeed his brother-in-law, Walter was able to reach into his quick wit toolbox and find a Walt Whitman quote on a previous page in Gael's "Lab Notes." Of course, Walt was able to do this because he's incredibly f---ing smart!! And yet, smart people tend to make the stupidest and laziest of mistakes. How else can anyone explain Walt leaving Gael's note of appreciation in the copy of Walt Whitman's <i>Leaves of Grass</i> that Gael gave to him. The only answer I can come up with is that Walt never actually opened the book. To be honest, I've recently done a rewatch of Breaking Bad. Seasons one to four. But I really can't recall when Gael gave Walt the book. Does anyone else know the history of this particular copy of <i>Leaves of Grass</i>?<br />
<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a>So that is the negative part of this episode. If it's a negative at all. Other viewers out there maybe able to convince me that Hank discovering the truth of Walt and Heisenberg this way is entirely reasonable. After all, this episode was all about tying up loose ends. But when you have so many loose ends to tie up, your bound to leave one or two left untied. Unfortunately for Walt, Hank Schroeder likes to have reading material while he's using the restroom.<br />
<br />
There was way too much happening is the episode to cover in just one post. So we're going to go with a bullet point list for the time being.<br />
<br />
<ul>
<li>The flashforward of Walt's 52nd B-Day really made viewers try to guess as to whom or what Walt was running from in the season premiere. DEA, Todd's people, the drug guys from Arizona. Others?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Lydia and Walt working as business partners. There's no way in hell I thought that was a good idea. In fact, I thought this finale's climax was going to involve Walter and Lydia's partnership going sour. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>At the time being, it appears that Todd and his gang of neo-Nazi criminals are no longer in play either. Was Todd cool with Walt abruptly ending the cooks. The process of shutting down the meth operation wasn't show to the viewers. But it appeared that the closing of shop went pretty smoothly. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>How about that "tying up loose ends" montage? Breaking Bad somehow made the offing of nine prisoners seem so joyful. Did we see what happened to the lawyer? </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Walt had a little smirk on his face when he saw Jesse taking the bong out of sight. When he was asking for his five million dollars in last week's episode, Walt predicted that Jesse would spend his days getting high and playing video games. Jesse ended up doing that without the five million. Was Walt doing Jesse a favor by giving him the cash? Or was he providing Jesse with the means to waste away his life? </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>I wonder how much money Walt actually made. Skylar made the point last season that he was making way more money that she could realistically launder through a single car wash operation. This dilemma entered my mind several times this year. What's the point of making tens of million of dollars if you don't have the means to launder it? Seeing that big pile of cash may have finally done the trick in making Walt realize this. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>There were a couple reminders of Walt's cancer. The busted up paper towel dispenser. The staring down of a fly (callback to the season three episode "Fly"). </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Walt and Jesse reminiscing about the RV days. Jesse asking why they didn't just buy a new RV with all the money they had. Have to admit, I never asked that question. I guess I'm satisfied with Walt's inertia answer. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>I kept on waiting for something awful to happen in that scene when the whole family was sitting by the pool. I was really nervous to see Walter Jr. and baby Holly at the opposite end of the pool. I don't know. I just expected something to fall from the sky. I know that doesn't make any sense (well, except for the fact that it's happened before). Still, critics and viewers alike have wondered if Walt's children were destined to pay the price for his sins. Furthermore, the season was nearing its final moments. So something big was going to happen any minute. Thankfully, that "something big" was Hank finding <i>Leaves of Grass</i>.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Speaking of Hank knowing the truth. How is Walt going to escape? We have nearly a year to speculate on that one.</li>
</ul>
That's all I got for tonight. Damn. The last eight weeks went by fast. I haven't been pleased with everything that's transpired this summer. Walt going way over the the dark side. I was pleased to see that <a href="http://watching-tv.ew.com/2012/08/27/breaking-bad-season-5-episode-7/" target="_blank">EW's Ken Tucker has similar feelings</a>. about this development. Still, can't believe the final eight episodes don't begin until next summer. Damn you AMC!!! Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-43389114258012542022012-08-30T08:03:00.001-07:002012-08-30T08:13:38.834-07:00UPDATE: Joss Whedon Developing S.H.I.E.L.D. at ABC<h3>
Marvel, ABC, and Whedon Play It Safe with S.H.I.E.L.D.</h3>
<br />
My <a href="http://criticalsquare.blogspot.com/2012/08/joss-whedon-should-runaways-back-to-tv.html" style="color: blue;" target="_blank">first post</a> on this blog a couple of weeks ago concerned Joss Whedon's new contract with Marvel Studio. More specifically, the TV component of this contract. I was excited at the possibilities of the Marvel Universe coming to the small screen (ABC). One possible show I especially want to see made is an adaptation of the <i>Runaways</i> comic created by writer Brian K. Vaughan (<i>Y: The Last Man, Ex Machina)</i>. Unfortunately, Runaways the TV series is a no go for now. The studio, network, and director have decided to go the way of S.H.I.E.L.D.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br /><br />
Honestly, a S.H.I.E.L.D. project doesn't get me particular excited. The main reason: we pretty much know Samuel L. Jackson's Nick Fury isn't going to be in it. Yes, he could end up making a cameo here and there. As for the other S.H.I.E.L.D. members that we're familiar with, Natasha Romanov (Scarlett Johansson), Clint Barton (Jeremy Renner), Maria Hill (Cobie Smulders), and the presumably deceased Agent Phil Coulsen (Clark Gregg), I don't think we're going to see much of them either.<br />
<br />
Some have made the argument that Maria Hill could be in the series because Cobie Smulders is a TV star, not a movie star. That's a fair point. Except when you consider that the show that's made her a TV star, CBS's <i>How I Met Your Mother</i>, is still on the air (and probably won't go anywhere for a couple more seasons). Furthermore, even if Smulders left that show, it's unlikely that joining another TV series will be the reason. Most actors leave their TV jobs in order to pursue a movie career (they work less, get paid more). The only way I see Cobie Smulders being a part of <i>S.H.I.E.L.D</i>. is if they pay her an exorbitant amount of money. And I'm pretty sure that ABC's budget will be more heavily allocated to expensive sets and CGI work and less to the actors' salaries.<br />
<br />
There's also the Agent Coulsen (Clark Gregg) factor. Many fans believe that he didn't die in <i>The Avengers</i>. I am not one of those fans. However, if Phil Coulsen didn't die, I think the reveal of his survival needs to play itself out in one of Marvel's movies (<i>The Avengers 2</i> being the most appropriate). A studio shouldn't kill off a character in a blockbuster film seen by tens of millions of people, only to resurrect him on a TV show that has a significantly smaller audience. Because if Coulsen begins to reappear in future Avengers movies, millions of moviegoers will be confused on the fact that he's still alive.<br />
<br />
With all that said, it looks like this S.H.I.E.L.D. project will not star any of the actors or characters previously established in Marvel's film franchise. After all, Whedon envisions the show as being <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/joss-whedons-marvel-shield-series-avengers-abc-366539" style="color: blue;" target="_blank">"autonomous" from the films.</a> Today, the most appealing aspect of this potential show is the involvement of Joss Whedon. For the most part, it feels as if Marvel and ABC are trying to play it safe with this one. S.H.I.E.L.D. could become just another show where government agents deal with the supernatural (<i>X-Files, Warehouse 13</i>, <i>Fringe</i>). I don't know if there is a mass appetite for these types of programs.<br />
<br />
There is no question that a potential S.H.I.E.L.D. series will have an enormous audience when (or if) it premiers. However, in the world of scripted television, short-term success doesn't automatically mean long-term success. If <i>S.H.I.E.L.D</i>. is a success in the long term, ABC may look to expand the Marvel Universe on TV. This is where I find another positive aspect of <i>S.H.I.E.L.D.</i>'s existence. One successful Marvel series will probably lead to the development of more Marvel series. Then, maybe--just maybe-- the <i>Runaways</i> will get their opportunity to leave the page of comic books and join their adult counterparts on the (small or big) screen. <br />
<br />Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-26914491808735939472012-08-28T19:59:00.002-07:002012-08-29T06:25:22.074-07:00Isaac Complicates RNC Coverage for CNN <h3>
How the Cable Network Handled Two Big News Stories</h3>
I was initially surprised when I looked at Fox News Channel's program guide for the night. My cable provider's guide had the usual programming listed: O'Reilly at eight o'clock, Hannity at nine. But of course they were broadcasting the Republican National Convention. This is Fox News we're talking about. My conclusion to why this cable news channel didn't schedule one large block of programming titled "Republican National Convention" is because it wasn't necessary. Fox News doesn't need to attract an audience for the Republican convention. They already have the target audience tuning in from 8-11 on a daily basis. Their loyal viewers were going to tune in no matter what. <br />
<br />
On the contrary, MSNBC and CNN need to attract viewers who might not otherwise watch this political event. Well, MSNBC is going to have less of a problem bringing in liberal viewers that will no doubt actively "hate watch" the RNC all week. But CNN is the one cable news channel that tries to play it neutral (even though they do lean left). They get equally excited for both the RNC and (next week's) DNC. Yet when the time came, CNN couldn't help but show Anderson Cooper standing out in the wind and rain instead of showing most of Tuesday night's speakers.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
<br />
It was an unfortunate coincidence that Hurricane Isaac was making landfall just as the convention coverage was beginning. CNN did break into the middle of Nikki Haley's speech after ten o'clock. Of course, Ann Romney was scheduled to begin speaking at that time. And CNN wasn't going to miss the wife's speech. However, the first cable news network missed a speech given by John Kasich, the charismatic governor from Ohio. It also ignored Rick Santorum even though the news channel spent all that time in the spring trying to convince its viewers that Santorum had a real shot at grabbing the GOP nomination.<br />
<br />
It's true that Hurricane Isaac was the primary reason why CNN didn't bother with these speeches. It's also true that a hurricane definitely warrants extensive news coverage. However, the real stories that come out of hurricanes usually don't present themselves until after the storm have passed. No offense to those who are getting hit by Isaac, but viewers don't actually learn anything new by watching idiotic news reporters stand out in the storm. Torrential rains and powerful winds are brought on by a hurricane every time. That is not "BREAKING NEWS." Furthermore, a reporter's microphone can get waterlogged or the storm interferes with the feed. So then BREAKING NEWS ends up trying to repair something that shouldn't be out in those conditions to begin with. Unfortunately--as mentioned above--when Anderson asks to stand out in a wrenching storm, CNN puts him out in that storm. <br />
<br />
A category one hurricane wasn't the only thing that prevented CNN from actually airing the RNC. Wolf Blitzer and Erin Burnett discussed what was ahead while there were speeches going on behind them (CNN likes to talk about what's next instead of what's happening). This is the network that promoted this event the most, but when the time comes, doesn't seem too eager to present it to its viewers. Why then have a five hour block of "Republican National Convention" if they you're only going to show a little over two hours? The answer: they're CNN. They wouldn't be CNN if they didn't do something nonsensical. <br />
<br />
Hey, at least there weren't any holograms. Not yet anyway. Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-71753672005098506472012-08-28T08:21:00.001-07:002012-09-17T08:42:33.737-07:00'Bates Motel' Casts Female LeadNorma Bates (Norman Bates's mother) will be played by Oscar nominated actress (<i>Up in the Air</i>) Vera Farmiga in the upcoming A&E series that will serve as a prequel to the Alfred Hitchcock directed 'Psycho.' <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/vera-farmiga-bates-motel-psycho-prequel-a-e-364885" target="_blank"><span style="color: red;">(THE HOLLYWOOD REPORTER)</span></a><br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;"><span style="color: black;">The article from The Hollywood Reporter's LIVE FEED blog mentions that the series has been described as a "<b>contemporary</b> exploration of Norman Bate's formative years. So if the series is set in the present and not a period piece, referring to it as a prequel may be a bit misleading.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;"><span style="color: black;">Some commentators have expressed their displeasure with television making yet another prequel. They've even singled out A&E specifically for abandoning the Arts and Entertainments that it originally stood for back in the '90s. However, isn't scripted television a step up from the reality garbage that has aired on the network for the past decade. </span></span><br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;"><span style="color: black;">I do empathize with people who are skeptical about prequels. The last TV prequel that I watched was <i>Caprica, </i>a SyFy show set prior to the events of the re-imagined <i>Battlestar Gallactica</i>. I liked a couple episodes of that show but I did drop it from my viewing list after it took a six-month hiatus between half seasons. That show may not have been a success but it wasn't because it was a prequel. It's because the writers and network didn't know what kind of show they wanted it to be. They sought to make a family drama that explored the various culture of the twelve colonies more thoroughly. It evolved into a mess that lacked narrative focus and momentum.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;"><span style="color: black;">The last prequel film I watched was <i>Prometheus</i>. Once again, this film's problems didn't have to do with the fact that it's a prequel. The screenplay for <i>Prometheus</i> was primarily written by Damon Lindelof, the co-creator and co-showrunner of the TV show <i>Lost</i>. Carlton Cuse, <i>Lost's</i> other showrunner, is the man developing <i>Bates Motel.</i> Maybe these are the right guys to go back and explore worlds that audiences are already familiar with. After all, <i>Lost </i>had its fair share of intriguing flashbacks that supplemented the events of the present.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;"><span style="color: black;"><i>Bates Motel</i> is the first TV project that Carlton Cuse has worked on since the ending of the island mystery serial that aired on ABC from 2004-2010. Damon Lindelof has worked on a few film projects since <i>Lost </i>ended. However, he is developing a series for HBO that is based on Tom Perrotta's novel <i>The Leftovers</i>.</span></span><br />
<span style="color: red;"><span style="color: black;"><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/damon-lindelof-tom-perrotta-leftovers-hbo-343038" target="_blank">(<span style="color: red;">THE HOLLYWOOD REPORTER).</span></a> </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;"><span style="color: black;"><i>The Leftovers</i> is set in a post-Rapture world. Thankfully, from what I've read, the novel is primarily set in a single suburban community of the United States. The book does not take a global look at what life after the Rapture would look like. I think Lindelof and HBO knew that they should avoid making a TV series that resembles <i>FlashForward </i>and other "post-catastrophic world event" shows. They're leaving the creation of shows like that to NBC and J.J. Abrams (<i>Revolution</i>).</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;"><span style="color: black;">I know a lot of people hated the ending of <i>Lost</i>. I have my own mixed feelings on the last season and last couple of hours. However, I still believe that Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof are great writers who know how to develop strong characters. For this reason, I'm looking forward to seeing both of these shows*.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;"><span style="color: black;"><i>*NOTE: </i>Bates Motel<i> has already been picked up for series. </i></span></span><span style="color: red;"><span style="color: black;">The Leftovers <i>adaptation</i></span></span><span style="color: red;"><span style="color: black;"><i> is still in the early stages of its development.</i> </span> </span><br />
<br />
<br />Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-75019567912485145842012-08-26T22:17:00.001-07:002012-08-27T06:41:35.067-07:00Breaking Bad 5.7 "Say My Name" Recap <h4>
Mr. Chips to Scarface. Or Anakin to Darth Vader</h4>
Fuck you Walt!. That thought entered my mind several times during this episode. He really is a complete and total asshole. Vince Gilligan and his writers have done an incredible job of transforming Breaking Bad's protagonist into its antagonist. Because in that final scene, I was desperately trying to convince myself that Mike killing Walter was a real possibility. Unfortunately, it has already been revealed that Walt will live to see his fifty-second birthday. That could be considered to be a minor problem in the show--the flashforward device always takes a little of the suspense away. Then again, nobody really expects this show to exist without Walter White. <br />
<br />
That's not to say that I still don't have a few quibbles with some of what's transpired this season.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
First off, Mike was a little sloppy during his final days. Last week he basically challenged Walt to escape from his clutches. Walt met that challenge and gained possession of the methylamine. Walt gaining control of the methylamine essentially screwed Jesse out of $5 million (Even though it was Jesse who vouched for Walter's plan, where "everybody wins," when Mike was irking to pull the trigger).<br />
<br />
And in this episode, Mike didn't want Jesse to pick up the bag and bring it to him. Yet, Walt was a suitable alternative? He must have known that Walt would be concerned about the nine guys locked up, that he would want their names. That's basically the only reason he gave Mike the heads up about the DEA. So when that motive is confirmed, what does Mike do? He refuses to give up the name, talks down to Walter, belittles him, and tells him how much betters things were when Gustavo Fring was in charge. Basically, an all out attack on Walt's pride. We all know how Walt feels about his pride. Then, not so shockingly, it's revealed that Walt did take the gun from Mike's bag. <br />
<br />
While Walt was the one that did the shooting, Mike didn't do himself any favors with how he handled the situation (I'm still going to miss Jonathan Banks' presence from this show).<br />
<br />
The bigger problem I have with Breaking Bad this season has to do with Walt's behavior. Yes, Mr. Chips has turned into Scarface. But for me, there are times when the transformation reminds me of Anakin Skywalker turning into Darth Vader. And if that sounds like an insult when you read it, that means you're reading it correctly. <br />
<br />
For me, Bryan Cranston's Walter White enjoys being evil a little too much. So much so that he completely fails to recognize how others see him. During the first few episodes, he was clueless to how Skylar felt about him. That scene where he was kissing her on the shoulder while in bed was very hard to watch. Could he not sense that she wasn't into that?<br />
<br />
Plus, Walt's whistle was a big fail for many critics (and me) last week. Jesse indirectly brought the issue up this week. Does Walter truly care about the young boy who died? Is he sorry? Walt insists that he does care. But his obsession with the "empire building" business obscure any sign of emotion that he might have.<br />
<br />
<b>"I'm in the empire building business."</b> That's the phrase that encompasses this problem of Scarface Walt. He's a former Chemistry teacher but Walter has also demonstrated a knack for history. Therefore, he must know that all empires eventually fall. Furthermore, before an empire falls, emperors tend to be usurped at one point or another. When you apply this to drug empires, these events tend to happen more quickly.<br />
<br />
Why Walt is set on building an empire is truly perplexing. He tells Jesse they can now cook meth without ever having to deal with dead bodies ever again. Seriously? Rightfully, Jesse seems pretty amused that Walt could actually believe that. So do the rest of us watching at home. It's hard to accept that that this is what Walt really believes. Has he learned nothing? He was in the game for one day before he had to kill someone. Killing is a natural aspect to the drug trade. To not understand that by now, Walt would have to be stupid. Does Walt have to be stupid in order to be the antagonist? I hope not.<br />
<br />
Walt is definitely the antagonist of this show. Like I said above, Gilligan and his staff have done a fantastic job of shifting the audience's feelings toward the character. I just want Walt to retain some of the qualities he had back when he was the protagonist. I want him to set realistic expectations. I want him to be smart. <br />
<br />
A few other thoughts:<br />
<ul>
<li>Replacing Jesse with Todd? Good luck. That will never work. Jesse may have failed Chemistry in high school but that doesn't mean he didn't have the potential. Walt prides himself on his art and knows that it can't just be learned. Plus, Todd has too much ambition. Can you really trust someone who wants to learn that badly and lead you to believe he doesn't care about payment?</li>
<li>Walt trying to start a conversation with Skylar at dinner was kind of funny. Her walking away was funnier. Did she maybe ask herself whether Jesse was fired or "fired?"</li>
<li>I'm a little surprised at the resolution Walt came up with. He knows this crew was selling meth at 70% purity. Clearly, they don't respect his craft. Yet, he's easily willing to get in bed with them.</li>
</ul>
God. I hate to complain so much. On the positive side, at least Hank was able to enjoy a victory after his boss told him he was wasting resources. That's one bald guy who was having a good day. Mike being allowed to die in peace was also a nice touch. He deserved that. Walt granting him that was the one good thing he did in this episode.<br />
<br />
Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-76517634040090973672012-08-24T05:49:00.001-07:002012-08-25T18:50:48.755-07:00Louie Episode 3.9 "Looking for Liz; Lilly Changes" Critical Round-UPFirst, a list of critics who've seen and have reviewed last night's episode of <i>Louie</i>.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/24/chloe-sevigny-obsessively-tries-help-louie-video_n_1827208.html" style="color: black;" target="_blank"></a><br />
<div style="color: blue;">
<a href="http://www.hitfix.com/whats-alan-watching/review-louie-looking-for-liz-lilly-changes-man-seeking-women" target="_blank"><b>HitFix-Alan Sepinwall</b></a></div>
<div style="color: blue;">
<a href="http://www.tvfanatic.com/2012/08/louie-review-desperately-seeking-sanity-and-sleep/" target="_blank"><b>TV Fanatic</b></a></div>
<div style="color: blue;">
<a href="http://screencrush.com/louie-review-looking-for-liz-lilly-changes/" target="_blank"><b>ScreenCrush</b></a></div>
<div style="color: blue;">
<a href="http://whatculture.com/tv/tv-review-louie-3-9-looking-for-lizlilly-changes.php" target="_blank"><b></b></a><b><a href="http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=9057892471668738730">WhatCulture!</a> </b></div>
<div style="color: blue;">
<a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/tv_club/features/2012/louie_season_3/week_9/louie_recap_louis_c_k_and_chlo_sevigny_have_a_memorable_cup_of_coffee_.html" target="_blank"><b>Slate</b></a></div>
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/24/chloe-sevigny-obsessively-tries-help-louie-video_n_1827208.html" target="_blank"><b style="color: blue;">Huffington Post</b></a><br />
<b style="color: blue;"><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/24/louies_masturbating_lady/" target="_blank">Salon</a> </b><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/24/chloe-sevigny-obsessively-tries-help-louie-video_n_1827208.html" target="_blank"> </a><br />
<br />
A couple my thoughts after the jump.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
First of all, I was pissed that I waited to buy tickets to Louis C.K.'s standup in Detroit this October. Because now they're sold out and I won't be able to experience the joy of paying only $45 and bypass fucking Ticketmaster. Though, considering it's scheduled to be held at the Masonic Temple,<span style="color: white;"> </span><a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20120823/NEWS01/120823032/masonic-theater-shutoff-notice-dte-electric-gas?odyssey=nav%7Chead" style="color: white;" target="_blank">I don't really feel as bad at the moment.</a><br />
<br />
As far at this episode goes, I feel like this has been the season of the "Eccentric Female Book Store Employee." We spent a couple of episodes that focused on Parker Posey's Liz. She seemed pretty straight in "Daddy's Girlfriend (Part 1)" and then we saw a more expressive side to her in the concluding episode. That isn't a bad thing. This week, Louie goes to the bookstore looking for Liz and finds a woman who doesn't even pretend to hide her real personality while on the job. This segment seemed a little unnecessary. Mostly because it seemed like I was watching a rerun. We've already seen Louie break up with a woman where he didn't have to say a word. And then he had the blind date with Laurie (Melissa Leo). I would rather see a whole episode with Louie and his daughters because those are the segments where I laugh the most. I can't help it, those girls are <span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.292969);">hilarious. Especially the younger daughter, Jane (Ursula Parker).</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-84486084947246132842012-08-23T11:09:00.000-07:002012-08-24T06:44:04.723-07:00"Community" and the Case of an Axed Showrunner<h4>
<i>Mad Men, Breaking Bad, and Lost.</i> Three shows that I couldn't imagine existing without their original creators. What about <i>Community</i>?</h4>
<br />
Yesterday I posted about the possibility that the upcoming fourth season of <i>Community</i> may be its last. I also mentioned that show has already lost the talents of Dan Harmon, the creator and showrunner, due to problems with the studio (Sony), network (NBC), and its most well known stars (Chevy Chase).<br />
<br />
The NBC comedy's new showrunners are former <i>Happy Endings</i> writers David Guarascio and Moses Port. It's not unusual for a television show to change showrunners during the course of its run. Most long running police procedurals like <i>CSI</i> and <i>Law and Order</i> switched showrunners multiple times. However, there are certain shows that are dependent on the voices of their original creators. <i> The West Wing</i> wasn't the same without Aaron Sorkin. <i>Gilmore Girls</i> moved on without Amy Sherman-Palladino for its seventh and final season. Fans of both those show were displeased with what they saw and heard on the screen after those writers left. Those writers had unique styles and visions which were impossible to replicate. Dan Harmon also has a writing style, vision, and (more importantly) passion for his creation that the new showrunners couldn't possibly possess. So as soon as the news broke about Harmon being fired<i>, </i>critics and fans alike began to ask if no <i>Community</i> at all may be preferable to a Harmon-less <i>Community</i>.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
<br />
The answer for me is no. First off, I want to spend more time with Jeff Winger and all the other characters Dan Harmon created. Second, I like <i>Happy Endings </i>and feel that <i>Community's </i>new writers will still be able to make me laugh. Finally, I want to see these characters move on to the next stage of their lives. Being the fourth season and, therefore, the fourth year of college, the characters should be moving on from Greendale Community College by season's end. Keyword is "should."<br />
<br />
While I want to see more <i>Community</i> no matter what, I understand those who hold the opposite position. They probably share the same concern that I have as the show moves forward. For me, I worry that I will constantly ask "what if" when watching the new version of the show. I can't help but be curious to the plans Dan Harmon had for his creation. What would the show looked like if he was still running things. The Hollywood Reporter had <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/community-dan-harmon-chevy-chase-364861" target="_blank"><span style="color: white;">an article yesterday</span> </a>in which Harmon provided a few "what if" answers to what he would have included in his fourth season. Reading that article made me a little sad.<br />
<br />
I wasn't a fan of <i>Gilmore Girls </i>when it aired but Amy Sherman-Palladino always knew what the final words of her show were going to be. Of course, those final words were never spoken because she wasn't with the show during its final season. It's for this reason, that many of that show's fans do not consider the final season to be a real part of the show. Many <i>Community </i>fans already feel the same way about their show now that its key voice is no longer involved.<i> </i>My feelings are more of a mixed bag. But I do know that even if <i>Community's</i> fourth season ends up making me laugh and I enjoy the stories the new writers come up with, I will always wonder what Harmon's version would have looked like.<br />
<br />
It sucks that Harmon was fired. In a perfect world, he would have been allowed to work on his show to its conclusion. Unfortunately, television is a business. A business where most programs never see a fourth season. Taking this into consideration, "NBC cancels<i> Community"</i> is a headline that would have disappointed me more than the one that read "Dan Harmon Fired."<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-58653040853566365212012-08-22T13:28:00.000-07:002012-08-22T13:48:16.106-07:00NBC's Future: Comedy Night, Done Right?<h3>
30 Rock and The Office are Closing. More to Follow?</h3>
<br />
For over two decades, Thursday nights on NBC was the place for "Must See TV." Some of the most popular sitcoms in history made their home from the 8-10pm time period. "The Cosby Show" and "Cheers" got the ball rolling in the '80s. "Frasier" and "Friends" led a still thriving NBC into the 21st century. Those four shows, along with "Seinfeld" and many others, garnered mass audiences for a reason. The were broad. People of all demographics could relate to the stories that were being told week after week. I was barely a teenager when I first started watching reruns of "Frasier" and "Friends" and I never had a hard time understanding most of what was happening. Sure, there was some minor adult humor that may have went over my head but those jokes didn't exclude someone of my demo from enjoying the show.<br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
Since "Frasier" and "Friends" ended their initial runs back in 2004, NBC has moved away from the broad, laugh track laced, traditional sitcom. Half hour comedies are now being shot in the single camera format often associated with the hour long drama. Laugh tracks are replaced with cuts to fantastical gags ("Scrubs" and "30 Rock") or mockumentary type commentary by the characters "The Office" and "Parks and Recreation." The most successful of NBC's new age sitcoms has been "The Office." "The Office" premiered near the end of the 2004-05 TV season with a short run of six episodes. This was the same TV season that marked a resurgence for the struggling ABC. "Lost," "Desperate Housewives," and "Grey's Anatomy" all premiered during the 2004-05 campaign. Those three shows, along with FOX's "House," were near the top of the rating charts. Those first 6 episodes of "The Office" didn't come any where near the popularity of these hour-long programs. Furthermore, overwhelming critical praise for the show was lacking. This looked like another case of an American adaptation failing to live up to the original British version.<br />
<br />
And yet, NBC did renew "The Office." The second season was much improved and the show won the Emmy for Outstanding Comedy in the fall of 2006. The improved storytelling, the Emmy win, and the newfound fame of Steve Carell (who had starred in The 40 Year-Old Virgin that summer) had transformed "The Office" into a legitimate hit. Fall of 2006, NBC launched the "30 Rock." This Tina Fey starring and produced show would take the Outstanding Comedy Emmy crown from "The Office" and keep for several years. Unfortunately for NBC, Fey's popularity and the Emmy wins did not translate into higher ratings. If anything. "30 Rock" has often had the benefit of having "The Office" be its lead in. <br />
<br />
Earlier this year, it was announced that the upcoming season would be "30 Rocks" last. This week, it was announced that ninth season of "The Office" would also be its final one. I don't have a problem with seeing either of these show leave the airwaves of NBC. I stopped watching "The Office" after Jim and Pam got married. I didn't stop watching as a demonstration of protest. I wasn't angry that they got married. I acutally loved that episode. But I never felt the urge to tune in since that fantastic episode. From what I've heard since I stopped tuning in, most viewers and critics have had similar feelings.<br />
<br />
I have gone back and forth with "30 Rock." It's always been a silly, albeit intelligent, comedy. Some seasons have weighed more on the silly side a little too much for my liking. And I have to admit, it's really hard for me to remember any of the arcs that have taken place in previous seasons. I know Fey's Liz Lemon has dated characters that were played by guys like Jon Hamm and Matt Damon (funny how she dates handsome guys like them even though the actress/writer/producer always implements self-deprecating humor into the show's weeks plots). Despite not having memorable seasons, the show has produced a numbers of memorable episodes, including this past season's live episode (I don't know the name of the episode off the top of my head, but that's not important). Anyway, I think NBC should be proud that it gave a critically loved but ratings challenged show seven seasons to do its thing.<br />
<br />
Now the question becomes, will NBC grant future seasons for a couple of its other fan favorite comedies? Obviously, I'm referring to "Parks and Recreation" and "Community." Neither of these shows has received the love of the Emmy voters in the same way that "The Office" and "30 Rock" have. Plus, "Community" has already <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/community-dan-harmon-fired-358836">lost Dan Harmon</a>, its creator and former showrunner, and has been moved the Friday nights (where shows go to die). "Parks and Rec" is entering its fifth season. NBC may view five seasons as being generous on their part. Both shows are not getting any popular and NBC is desperate to return to the glory day of "Must See TV."<br />
<br />
So it's strange to think that, in approximately nine months, "Community," "Parks and Recreation," "The Office," and "30 Rock" will all be cancelled and/or concluded. After all, it was only a couple of years ago when NBC was using the slogan, "Comedy Night Done Right" to promote this Thursday night lineup. Now, they may have a Thursday night lineup that they feel is more "broad" and inclusive than "Community" and "Parks and Rec." I'm confident that NBC will discover that shows like "Animal Practice" and "Go On" will appeal to a wider audience. Families, from grandpa to granddaughter, will enjoy a show that features an adorable monkey. But how many families will tune in together? To what lengths will they go to make sure they don't miss an episode? Will they use a DVR, On Demand, log in to Hulu in case they miss it live? Will they miss it when it goes on hiatus? History and common sense tells us they won't do these things. Not to the same degree that fanbases for cults shows like "Community" do. <br />
<br />
Over the last decade, critics have been harsh on NBC. They have knocked it for its aweful ratings, its lack of buzz worthy dramas The network has been criticised for failing to create a distinctive brand like its competitors have been able to do. Most recently, it was criticized for its various flubs during the Olympics. Some of those <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/nbc-gabby-douglas-animal-practice-promo-olympics-358229">flubs included </a>the promotional material for "Animal Practice." The one saving grace for the network has been its comedies. They may look and sound different from what older viewers may be used to. They may be aimed at a much smaller audience. But those who watch "Community", love "Community." Those who love "Parks and Rec," will fight for "Parks and Rec." I can safely say that if "Animal Practice" fails, there will be no "save the show" campaign. Because the target audience for that type of comedy is not a loyal one. <br />
<br />
For me, a "Comedy Night Done Right" is one that makes me laugh for two whole hours. You can do that with both "cult" comedies and "broad" comedies. It's not an either/or situation. The two can co-exist. To abandon original, creative, and hilarious storytelling would be the opposite of doing right by comedy. That's Comedy Night Done Wrong.<br />
<br />Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-45344648012254906522012-08-20T10:27:00.000-07:002012-08-20T10:55:26.063-07:00Breaking Bad 5.6 "Buyout" Critical Round-Up What some critics thought:<br />
<a href="http://entertainment.time.com/2012/08/20/breaking-bad-watch-guess-whos-coming-to-dinner/">TIME's James Poniewozik </a><br />
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/maureen-ryan/breaking-bad-recap-buyout_b_1807142.html">Huffington Post's Maureen Ryan</a><br />
<a href="http://watching-tv.ew.com/2012/08/19/breaking-bad-review-season-5-episode-6/">Entertainment Weekly's Ken Tucker</a><br />
<br />
Some of my thoughts:<br />
<br />
This week's Breaking Bad was not the most praised of this shortened eight episode "season." Several critics found faults with some of the decisions and actions taken up by Walt, Jesse, and Mike. What's up with Walt whistling? He obviously knew Jesse was still in the house and could hear him. Does Walt really not care about little Drew Sharp getting killed? Or is he trying to act like he doesn't care? That's an unwise strategy since he already knows how Skylar has reacted to his Scarface side. Walt's apathetic response to a child getting murdered probably played a part in Jesse's decision to get out of the meth game for good. That and the prospect of a $5 million buyout.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a>James Poniewozik (see link above) also notes Jesse's overall reaction to the shooting. TIME's TV critic feels that Jesse moved on from his initial emotional reaction a little too quickly. I had a similar thought. The dinner scene between Walt, Skylar, and the uncomfortable Jesse was certainly one the more comedic scenes of this season. I laughed at the whole lasagna bit (because it's so true!!) and loved Jesse's response to Skylar bringing up her "affair" with Ted. But I couldn't help but feel that the writers went back in time and
wrote for an earlier (pre-Gale) version of his character in that scene. I felt that he should have still been struggling with Todd's murder of Drew. Of course, Jesse has seen and taken part in a lot of horrible acts of violence. So maybe he's able to compartmentalize these horrific moments more effectively than he used to. I don't think Jesse has completely gotten over the murder quite yet. He just had to shift his mindset given his desire and opportunity to "retire."<br />
<br />
The other problem that stuck out for most was the tying up of Walter to the radiator. I mean, come on!! Mike is smarter than that. Sure, he may not have had many more options to confine Walt. But he could have rid the room of miscellaneous objects before he left. He knew Walt wasn't going to just sit there and wait for his return. "Buyout" had more instances of story driving characters, instead of the other way around.<br />
<br />
I hate to focus on the negative so much. But Breaking Bad sets a high standard. The opening sequence was consistent with this high standard. Especially the moment Walt reaches for the second barrel and you know that Drew Sharp's parents will never receive closure on the case of their missing son. <br />
<br />
This brings me back to to one more negative: We never did learn what Mike thought about Todd killing the boy. Yes, he was upset that he brought a gun on the job without telling him. However, last week Mike said there were two type of heists. (1) those that are successful and (2) those that leave witnesses (alive). Mike also cares for his granddaughter. So it seems like Todd's action conflicted with different aspect of Mike's professional code. The character of Todd provided the show with an easy out. The writers avoided the question of what our main protagonists would have done if Todd hadn't made his decision to shoot an innocent child. I want to know what Mike and Walt would have done differently or if they ultimately would have carried out the same horrific act.<br />
<br />
With all of these issues, I am going to be a little depressed in a couple of weeks when the long wait for the final eight episodes begins. This is one of the five greatest dramas in the history of television. I also expect the final two episodes of 2012 to be of a highest quality and put any problems I had this week to the back of my mind.<br />
<br />Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-62790980828138523442012-08-17T11:29:00.003-07:002012-08-17T11:29:42.143-07:00Joss Whedon should Runaway(s) back to TVMarvel's The Avengers made a little dough at the box office this past summer. Nearly 1.5 billion dollars. Many people felt that a movie that assembled Iron Man, Hulk, Thor, and Captain America was guaranteed to make all the money in the world. Truthfully, the film's incredible financial and critical success received a nice bump by the man who was hired to rewrite the script and direct the epic project: Joss Whedon. It's likely that a fair percentage of those who saw The Avengers on opening weekend didn't even know who Joss Whedon was. I know there are a lot of people out there who would find such a thought utterly insane. Because for those who have been lucky enough to experience his work in television, with Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Angel, and Firefly (and its concluding film chapter Serenity), Joss Whedon is a god of pop culture. Actually, he was a god of <i><b>cult </b></i>pop culture.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
Of course, it's difficult to refer to him as cult now. Today, he is part of the mainstream. He has entered Christopher Nolan territory. So it should be no surprise that Marvel announced yesterday that Whedon will indeed write and direct The Avengers 2 (announced for May 1, 2015). Yay!<br />
<br />
Signing on the Marvel sequel is just a part (the biggest part) of Whedon's overall exclusive deal with the studio. But for me, the more exciting development of his new deal is the return to the medium that made Whedon a god among fangirls and fanboys. He has been given the task to develop a show set in the Marvel Universe that will air on ABC. I'm not sure what kind of show the suits at Disney and Marvel have in mind. But I think the perfect source material to adapt--as far as the small screen and Whedon's creative genius are concerned--is the comic book Runaways. <br />
<br />
Not to spoil too much about the series, but it focuses on a group of young teenagers who have varied super powers. And the title pretty much makes it clear that these teenagers are on their own. How they end up on their own is the plot of the very first issue but I won't mention this reason just because some people want absolutely zero spoilers.<br />
<br />
Runaways was created by Brian K. Vaughn and Adrien Alphona but the series had other writers and artists work on it before it went on hiatus a few years ago. Joss Whedon was one of the writers. In fact, Whedon wrote a passionate fan letter when he found out the series was getting cancelled after Issue 18. Perhaps not coincidentally, the series was brought back to life when sales of the collected volumes, which included the letter, were higher than expected.<br />
<br />
Talk (and more than just talk) of a film adaptation began prior to the series going on its current "hiatus." But it seems that plans for a film have been shelved for the time being. I'm actually glad the movie has moved to development hell because I think it would make for a better television show. And who better to develop a Runaways TV series than Joss Whedon.<br />
<br />
There were already rumblings (among fans) of Whedon directing the Runaways movie long before he was signed on to take over the reins of The Avengers. And now he has a new contract that has him developing a TV series for ABC. Obviously, any show set in the Marvel Universe is going to have a significantly smaller budget than any of the movies. Runaways has had its fair share of epic moments during its run. However, the strongest aspect of the series is the relationships that develop between the different runaways. The bottom line: the runaway's are teenagers dealing with the usual teenage related problems while simultaneously facing off with evil supernatural forces. Joss Whedon would be right at home with this storytelling framework. Of course, he wouldn't be the showrunner so it wouldn't be like he was repeating himself by doing an updated version of Buffy the Vampire Slayer. <br />
<br />
Many fans would prefer a movie. Movies are bigger and sexier. But movies, especially those of the comic book variety, are prone to lose the more nuanced moments among all the spectacle. Unfortunately, TV dramas on ABC and other networks have been incurring similar issues. But Whedon has a new found power of influence. That can happen when you write and direct the most successful comic book movie of all time. So he could be able to create the show that he wants to create as well and play a part in choosing the permanent writing staff. <br />
<br />
The last television program that Joss Whedon created was FOX's Dollhouse. For many of us, that show did not live up to the standard of his previous work (to be honest, I only saw one or two episodes). With finding success on the big screen, it would be great to see Whedon return to the medium that made him such an icon among millions of fans (and they, or we, really are fanatics!) ABC has been looking for a post-Lost serialized drama for several years now. ABC, The Runaways, and Joss Whedon: that sounds to me like the right ingredients to a successful endeavor. . Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-66764913042843220232011-10-14T06:20:00.000-07:002011-10-14T06:20:18.872-07:00Community: Season 3, Episode 4 'Remedial Chaos Theory' Previews and RecapsAs of Friday morning, I still haven't seen this week's episode of Community. If others are to be believed, this is probably the best episode of the season so far.<br />
<br />
<b><u>Previews</u></b><br />
<a href="http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/2011/10/13/tv-tonight-community-rolls-the-die/">TIME--James Poniewozik</a><br />
<a href="http://watching-tv.ew.com/2011/10/13/community-remedial-chaos-theory-parks-and-recreation-big-bang-theor/">Entertainment Weekly--Ken Tucker</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/whats-alan-watching/posts/community-remedial-chaos-theory-crisis-on-infinite-abeds">HitFix--Alan Sepinwall</a><br />
<br />
<u><b>Recaps</b> </u><br />
<a href="http://tvrecaps.ew.com/recap/community-season-3-episode-4-timelines/">Entertainment Weekly</a><br />
<a href="http://www.cinemablend.com/television/Community-Watch-Season-3-Episode-4-Remedial-Chaos-Theory-36031.html">Cinema Bland</a><br />
<a href="http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/telefile/2011/10/community-grading-the-alternat.php">Television Without Pity</a>Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9057892471668738730.post-79458797619106078252011-10-13T12:28:00.000-07:002011-10-13T12:28:51.274-07:00Breaking Bad FinaleHere are some recaps on 'Face Off', the appropriately titled Season Four finale of Breaking Bad. Understandably, they are on the positive side. <br />
<a href="http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/2011/10/10/breaking-bad-watch-the-one-who-knocks/">TIME--James Poniewozik</a><br />
<a href="http://www.aoltv.com/2011/10/09/breaking-bad-season-4-finale-recap/">AOL--Mo Ryan</a><br />
<a href="http://web.me.com/mcgeeryan/The_Pod_Squad/Talking_TV_with_Ryan_and_Ryan/Entries/2011/10/9_Breaking_Bad_Season_4_Finale.html">"Talking TV with Ryan and Ryan Podcast"</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.tvguide.com/News/Roush-Review-Breaking-1038567.aspx">TV Guide Magazine--Matt Roush</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/whats-alan-watching/posts/breaking-bad-face-off-say-uncle">HitFix--Alan Sepinwall</a><br />
<a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2011/10/breaking-bad-recap-the-one-who-knocks.html">Los Angeles Times--Todd VanDerWerff</a>Chris Kw.http://www.blogger.com/profile/05572288395118293590noreply@blogger.com0